Table 2.
CBR DST explanatory example: Did you find the explanation case useful?
| |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluator5 point scale(3 point scale) | Observed Agreement | Agreement expected by chance alone | κ | 95% C.I. | Interpretation |
End users & Expert 1 | 89.2% (70.8%) | 83.0% (58.4%) | 0.36 (0.30) | 0.19 – 0.53 (0.14 – 0.46) | Fair (Fair) |
End users & Expert 2 | 83.96% (46.0%) | 84.3% (43.2%) | −0.02 (0.05) | −0.10 – 0.04 (0.04 – 0.14) | None* (Poor) |
Expert 1 & Expert 2 | 87.03% (59.2%) | 87.3% (52.6%) | −0.01 (0.14) | −0.08 – 0.07 (0.03 – 0.26) | None* (Poor) |