Table 2.
Item | Participants’ LSCb | P Value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Moderate | High | Excellent | ||
Past CP experience (% Yes)c | 15.2 | 12.6 | 11.4 | 8.9 | NS |
Period since joining the CP (months) | 18 | 21.6 | 20.5 | 24.2 | 0.036 |
CP meetings attended over last 12 months (%) | 29.5 | 40.7 | 50.1 | 61.4 | < 0.0001 |
Time spent on CP activity (hours per month) | 18.38 | 20.66 | 29.44 | 26.6 | NS |
Since joining the CP, number of times participant: | |||||
Recruited new members to the CP | 5.73 | 8.53 | 7.17 | 12.1 | 0.027 |
Served as CP’s spokesperson | 5.70 | 7 | 7.45 | 13.96 | 0.001 |
Served as CP’s representative to other groups | 6.28 | 5.72 | 4.59 | 10.87 | 0.003 |
Implemented CP -sponsored educational/ culturalevents | 6.22 | 9.18 | 7.74 | 14.27 | 0.006 |
Since joining the CP, how many: | |||||
CP committees worked on | 0.75 | 1.19 | 1.06 | 1.56 | 0.003 |
CP committee or team leadership positions held | 0.22 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.61 | < 0.0001 |
All cells depict mean values (N= 668);
LSC: Leadership Skills Category (Participants’ rating of leadership skills in their CPs);
Those with past experience were 11% of the sample; CP: community partnership; NS: not significant.