Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 5;6(1):96–107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6010096

Table 2.

Smoking cessation counselling behaviour of midwives, gynaecologists and paediatricians in Saarland, Germany.

Total (n = 315) % (95%-CI) Midwives (n = 159) % (95%-CI) Gynaecologists (n= 98) % (95%-CI) Paediatricians (n = 58) % (95%-CI)
At the primary contact
Routinely (always) screening for smoking status 67 (61.1–71.6) 76 (69.2–82.4) 80 (71.1–86.9) 17 (9.6–28.9)
Documenting smoking status in medical record 81 (76.4–85.0) 90 (84.1–93.6) 87 (78.4–92.0) 48 (35.9–60.8)
Subsequent contacts
Routinely (always) addressing smoking 15 (11.6–19.5) 14 (9.4–20.3) 23 (15.6–32.2) 5 (1.8–14.1)
Documenting changes in smoking behaviour 59 (53.4–64.3) 58 (50,1–65.4) 78 (69.2–85.4) 29 (19.2–42.0)
Extent of counselling
  Not at all 2 (1.1–4.6) 3 (1.0–6.4) 5 (1.8–14.1)
  Advice only 26 (21.5–31.2) 21 (15.5–28.2) 26 (18.1–35.3) 40 (28.1–52.5)
  Brief counselling (< 10 min.) 61 (55.9–66.7) 65 (57.6–72.4) 61 (50.9–69.9) 52 (39.2–64.1)
  Counselling >10 minutes 10 (7.4–14.2) 11 (6.9–16.8) 13 (8.0–21.6) 3 (1.0–11.7)
Use of self-help-brochures
  No brochures at hand 74 (68.8–78.5) 83 (76.0–87.8) 59 (48.8–68.0) 76 (63.5–85.0)
  Brochures are displayed 19 (14.7–23.4) 10 (6.4–16.0) 32 (23.5–41.8) 19 (10.9–30.9)
  Brochures are handed over 7 (5.0–10.9) 7 (4.0–12.2) 9 (5.0–16.7) 5 (1.8–14.1)