Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 23;106(19):7905–7909. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809145106

Table 1.

Comparison of model performance in predicting the abundance of infected individuals over a 28 day interval

Loss rate term Loss rate = Relative mean -log10(likelihood)
Relative DIC
No site differences Site differences No site differences Site differences
Seasonal (death + recovery) M(1+α sin(2π(t−Δ)))I(t) 0 −1.6 (−4.4, 1.6) 0 1.3
Constant (death + recovery) γI(t) 14 (12, 16) 12 (10, 15) 13 13
Recovery 28 days, seasonal death βS(τ)/(τ)Λ(t)N(τ)q+D(t)/(t) 37 (35, 39) 36 (33, 39) 37 38
Recovery 28 days, constant death βS(τ)/(τ)exp(λε)N(τ)q+λ/(t) 44 (42, 46) 41 (39, 44) 44 42

M, α, and Δ are the mean, amplitude, and phase shift, respectively. γ is the constant loss rate. τ = t − ε, where the period of infection ε is 28 days. Seasonal loss rate Λ (t) = exp(−∫τt D(xx), where seasonal mortality is D(t) = b(1 + a sin(2π (t − σ ))), with b, a, and σ being the mean, amplitude, and phase shift, respectively. λ is the constant death rate. 95% credibility intervals for −log10(likelihood) are given in parentheses.