Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Microbiol. 2009 Nov 14;11(4):992–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01824.x

Table 3.

Comparative analysis of curli and cellulose production and adherence to HT-29 cells by EPEC E2348/69 and EHEC EDL933strains.

Strain Curli* Cellulose** Adherence to HT-29 cells
CFUs × 107/ml ±SD (%)
Adherence to bovine gut tissue
CFUs × 107/ml ±SD (%)
E2348/69 EDL933 E2348/69 EDL933
Wild type + + 4.9 ±0.3 (100) 1.43±0.09 (100) 1.09 ±0.09 (100) 1.11 ±0.07 (100)
ΔcsgA ++ 2.2 ±0.2 (45) 0.75±0.04 (52) 0.49 ±0.04 (45) 0.23 ±0.04 (21)
ΔcsgA(pCsgA) + + 5.6 ±0.7 (114) 2.55±0.04 (178) ND ND
ΔcsgA(pCP994) ++ 6.9 ±0.8 (141) 1.22±0.08 (85) ND ND
ΔbcsA + 3.9 ±1.2 (81) 0.34±0.07 (24) 0.63 ±0.06 (58) 0.62 ±0.14 (56)
ΔbcsA(pBcsA) + + 4.8 ±0.5 (98) 1.47±0.12 (103) ND ND
ΔbcsA(pCP994) ++ 3.6 ±0.3 (73) 0.77±0.13 (54) ND ND
ΔcsgAΔbcsA 7.0 ±0.3 (15) 0.18±0.08 (12) 0.10 ±0.04 (9) 0.21 ±0.03 (20)
ΔcsgAΔbcsA(pBcsA) + 3.6 ±1.6 (74) 1.42±0.55 (99) ND ND
ΔcsgD 4.4 ±0.4 (89) 0.92±0.02 (65) 0.82 ±0.07 (75) 0.88 ±0.10 (79)
ΔcsgD(pCP994) ++ ++ 32.7 ±4.3 (667) 7.22±0.63 (505) ND ND

The experiments were performed three times in triplicate and the results represent the mean of the averages obtained from those three experiments ± standard deviations. The data correspond to 6 h of incubation. +, Positive expression; −, negative expression; ++ high levels of expression.

*

Phenotypic production of curli as demonstrated by EM, Congo red staining and immunoblotting;

**

Production of cellulose as determined by calcofluor binding.