Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Immunol. 2009 Mar 14;46(8-9):1647–1653. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.02.021

Table 1.

Cooperative bactericidal activity of anti-fHbp mAb, JAR 4 (IgG2a), when tested together with second anti-fHbp mAbs and human complementa

Second mAb Ig Isotype fH Inhibitionb Location of Residues Distance (Å)c Strain (fHbp variant)d Combination BC50, μg/mle
D25 G58
mAb 502 G2a - R204 27 32 H44/76 (1) 0.5
JAR 5 G2b ++ G121, K122 42 24-26 H44/76 (1) 0.4
JAR 3f G3 ++ G121, K122 42 24-26 NZ98/254 (1) 1
JAR 5f G2b ++ G121, K122 42 24-26 NZ98/254 (1) 4
JAR 10 G1 - E180 36 41 8047 (2) >50
JAR 10 G1 - K192 39 43 8047 (2) >50
JAR 11f G2a + A174 39 47 8047 (2) 5
JAR 13f G2a ++ S216 47 47 8047 (2) 4
JAR 32 G2a ++ K174 39 47 BuFa 1/03 (2) 10
JAR 33 G2a - E180 36 41 BuFa 1/03 (2) >50
JAR 33 G2a - R192 39 43 BuFa 1/03 (2) >50
JAR 35 G2b ++ K174 39 47 BuFa 1/03 (2) 20
a

None of the mAbs was individually bactericidal against the strains shown (BC50>50 μg/ml).

b

ELISA inhibition was performed as described (Beernink et al., 2008) and defined by ++,>75%; +, 25 to 45%; -, <15%.

c

Distances were measured between the alpha-carbon of JAR 4 epitope residue and that of the residue affecting the epitope of the second mAb using SwissPDB Viewer/DeepView (http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/) using coordinates from the NMR solution structure of the entire of fHbp molecule (antigenic variant 1, strain MC58) (Cantini et al., 2009).

d

The four test strains each expressed different fHbp peptides that were recognized by JAR 4. The strains were selected because they also bound with the respective second mAbs tested.

e

Minimal combined concentration of the two mAbs sufficient for bactericidal activity (50 percent killing after 1 hr of incubation with human complement)

f

Data reported previously (Beernink et al., 2008).