Purification and characterization of ECT1 and
ECT1HCT. A, overlay of ECT1 and
ECT1HCT elution profiles collected during passage of the
samples over a16 × 500 mm Superdex 75 gel filtration column. Binding of
HCT to ECT1 resulted in an elution volume shift from 52
to 60.5 ml. This corresponds to a change in estimated molecular mass
(spherical protein) from 35 to 22 kDa, compared with actual molecular masses
of 12. kDa and 15 kDa for ECT1 and ECT1HCT,
respectively. The change in elution volume suggests that HCT
binding effectively reduced the spherical volume of ECT1, likely by
out-competing homodimer formation. B, 15% SDS-PAGE gel of the
ECT1HCT elution peak and individually purified
components visualized by Coomassie staining. ECT1 and
HCT were produced individually as fusion proteins and reconstituted
as described under “Experimental Procedures.” C, CD
wavelength scan of ECT1 and ECT1HCT in 10
mm sodium phosphate (pH 7) at 25 °C. Although retaining a shape
indicative of mixed secondary structure, ECT1HCT
exhibits a greater molar ellipticity than ECT1. Although this may
be partially explained by the additional α-helical content contributed
by HCT, it is also likely that HCT stabilizes
ECT1 fold. This is further supported by the increase in thermal
stability observed for ECT1HCT versus
ECT1 alone (D) and additionally studied in
Fig. 4.