Analysis of ECT1 chemical shift change upon the addition of
HCT and a model of the proposed domain arrangement in the
full-length EH peripheral stalk complex. Assignment of the 15N
HSQC spectra presented in Fig.
4 permitted the calculation of ECT1 amide-proton
chemical shift changes (Δ1Hδ) upon binding
HCT. A, as can be seen, the majority of residues
experiencing the most significant chemical shift perturbation upon
HCT binding are located in the N- and C-terminal helices of
ECT1 (residues for which no assignments could be obtained in either
the ECT1 (Ser113, Gly148, and
Ile164) or ECT1HCT (Ser134,
Asp135, and Gly136) spectra are marked with an
asterisk). B, the positions analogous to the
Ta_ECT1 residues undergoing the largest chemical shift changes are
highlighted in the available crystal structure of Ph_ECT with one
dimer partner removed (Protein Data Bank code 2dma; Ref.
11). The largest change in
chemical shift in the middle portion of the structure is experienced by
Tyr146, which can be seen located close to the N- and C-terminal
α-helices of Ph_ECT in the crystal structure (Ta_E Y146
corresponds to Ph_E M157). C, HCT, modeled as an
α-helix and guided by the data presented here, is docked onto the
Ph_ECT crystal structure monomer. Continuing below the globular
ECT1HCT domain, the N-terminal domain,
ENT2HNT, is modeled as a pair of parallel helices,
representing the coiled-coil domain. We speculate that the N-terminal
α-helix of HNT is folded back to interact with and stabilize
the N-terminal ends of the coiled-coil domain. D, the resulting EH
model placed into a schematic model of the T. acidophilum A-ATPase.
The stoichiometry of the EH peripheral stalks has recently been determined for
the related A/V-ATPase from T. thermophilus
(6).