Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Inform. 2008 May 24;42(1):74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.05.009

Table 8.

Comparison of the clustering performance among GO Fuzzy c-means, FuzzyK, SOM and Gaussian mixture model using datasets A and B. GOFuzzyx% represents x percentage of GO annotation was used in GO Fuzzy c-means. ClusterJudge [33] was used to compute the z-scores with 10 runs for each of the clustering results. A clustering result with higher z-score indicates that the clusters are more likely to be biologically relevant.

Method z-scores and standard
error for Dataset A
z-scores and standard
error for Dataset B
GOFuzzy25% 91.18 ± 3.22 119.10 ± 3.47
GOFuzzy50% 175.90 ± 4.68 181.20 ± 3.36
GOFuzzy75% 248.40 ± 3.81 255.10 ± 4.65
GOFuzzy100% 323.10 ± 7.59 316.60 ± 6.04
FuzzyK 102.33 ± 1.85 108.10 ± 2.32
Fuzzy c-means 68.08 ± 5.52 83.12 ± 4.57
FuzzySOM 68.56 ± 2.66 81.48 ± 5.43
FLAME 66.18 ± 4.83 85.55 ± 5.93
SOM 44.13 ± 0.61 52.62 ± 0.30
Gaussian 0.72 ± 0.030 73.55 ± 0.77