Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Apr;8(4):4–11. doi: 10.1080/15265160802166017

Table 5.

Results of Hierarchical Multiple Regression of Moral Action on Selected Variables

Blocks Final Unstandardized Regression Weight (Standard error) Final Standardized (β) Regression Weight t-Test With Level of Significance
Block 1 (R2= .070, p < .001)
   Age 0.35 (0.04) 0.04 0.82, p = .414
   Female gender 2.80 (0.92) 0.12 3.03, p = .003
   Master’s education 2.71 (0.80) 0.17 3.38, p = .001
Block 2 (R2 change = .002, p = .750)
   Social worker 0.51 (0.87) 0.03 0.58, p = .560
   Hospital work setting −0.42 (0.65) −0.03 −0.64, p = .520
   Years in practice −0.26 (0.35) −0.04 −0.75, p = .453
Block 3 (R2 change = .018, p = .022)
   Ethics education in:* 0.71 (1.11) 0.04 0.64, p = .526
   Professional program only 1.63 (1.11) 0.09 1.46, p = .145
   Continuing education/In-House only Both 1.25 (1.10) 0.07 1.14, p = .257
Block 4 (R2 change = .196, p < .001)
   Frequency of resource use 1.78 (0.38) 0.20 4.68, p < .001
   Perceived usefulness 2.56 (0.34) 0.32 7.43, p < .001
Block 5 (R2 change = .015, p = .001)
   Confidence 0.58 (0.18) 0.13 3.24, p = .001
*

No ethics education served as reference group. Final R2 = .301 (adj. R2 = .284)