Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 23;27(13):2137–2143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.4052

Table 4.

Proportional Hazards Model: Continuous Hormone Therapy Duration

Comparison Unadjusted
Adjusted*
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Overall survival 0.88 0.83 to 0.93 < .0001 0.86 0.81 to 0.91 < .0001
Disease-free survival 0.86 0.82 to 0.90 < .0001 0.85 0.80 to 0.89 < .0001
Cause-specific mortality§ 0.81 0.70 to 0.94 .004
Local failure§ 0.92 0.85 to 1.00 .052
Distant metastasis§ 0.78 0.69 to 0.89 .0002

Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.

*

HR is adjusted for age (< 70 [reference level] or ≥ 70 years), radical prostatectomy (yes [reference level] or no), nodal status (negative [reference level] or positive), centrally reviewed Gleason score (2 to 6 [reference level] v 7 v 8 to 10), and stage (A/B [reference level] or C).

P value from χ2 test.

Cox proportional hazards model was used.

§

Fine and Gray's model was used.

The number events are too few to have stable estimates.