Table 4.
Proportional Hazards Model: Continuous Hormone Therapy Duration
Comparison | Unadjusted |
Adjusted* |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR | 95% CI | P† | HR | 95% CI | P† | |
Overall survival‡ | 0.88 | 0.83 to 0.93 | < .0001 | 0.86 | 0.81 to 0.91 | < .0001 |
Disease-free survival‡ | 0.86 | 0.82 to 0.90 | < .0001 | 0.85 | 0.80 to 0.89 | < .0001 |
Cause-specific mortality§ | 0.81 | 0.70 to 0.94 | .004 | —‖ | — | |
Local failure§ | 0.92 | 0.85 to 1.00 | .052 | — | — | |
Distant metastasis§ | 0.78 | 0.69 to 0.89 | .0002 | — | — |
Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.
HR is adjusted for age (< 70 [reference level] or ≥ 70 years), radical prostatectomy (yes [reference level] or no), nodal status (negative [reference level] or positive), centrally reviewed Gleason score (2 to 6 [reference level] v 7 v 8 to 10), and stage (A/B [reference level] or C).
P value from χ2 test.
Cox proportional hazards model was used.
Fine and Gray's model was used.
The number events are too few to have stable estimates.