Table 2.
Summary of conclusions reached in the text.
| categories | ||
|---|---|---|
| taxon | principal function of white and black pelagea | likelihoodb |
| (a) black and white quills | ||
| echidnas | aposematism | likely |
| tenrecsc | aposematism | likely |
| hedgehogs | aposematism | likely |
| new world porcupines | aposematism | very likely |
| old world porcupines | aposematism | very likely |
| (b) horizontal white dorsal fur | ||
| mephitids, mustelidsc, herpestidsc | aposematism | very likely |
| striped possumsc | aposematism | likely |
| anteatersc | aposematism | possible |
| (c) black and white face masks | ||
| canidsc, procyonidsc, mustelids, mephitids, viverridsc | aposematism | likely |
| possumsc, dwarf lemursc and three-toed sloths | anti-glare | best guess |
| lemursc | conspec signals | best guess |
| callitrichidsc | sexual signals | best guess |
| guenonsc | — | unknown |
| old world monkeysc, gibbons | — | unknown |
| artiodactylsc | conspec signals | possible |
| or thermoregulation | best guess | |
| (d) contrasting necks or chests | ||
| gymnuresc, mustelidsc, viverridsc | aposematism | likely |
| various species (e.g. Ryukyu flying fox) | — | unknown |
| ursidsc | dominance badges | best guess |
| (e) body with blocks of black and white fur | ||
| various solitary species (e.g. Malayan tapir) | disruptive | best guess |
| various social species (e.g. b&w colobus, gazelles) | conspec signals | best guessd |
| various species with horizontal border (e.g. blackbuck) | — | unknown |
| (f) black body and white spots or blotches | ||
| various species (e.g. quolls) | pattern blending | likely |
| (g) trunk with black transverse stripes | ||
| marsupialsc, carnivoresc, duikersc | pattern blending | best guess |
| zebras | — | unknown |
| (h) contrasting feet, legs and rumps | ||
| feet: kangaroosc, primatesc | non-functional | best guess |
| legs: carnivoresc | aposematism | best guess |
| legs: bovidsc | conspec signals | possible |
| rumps: artiodactylsc | signalse or thermorgn | possible |
| (i) black and white tails | ||
| ringed tails: primatesc carnivoresc | conspec signals | likely |
| ringed tails: carnivoresc | aposematism | best guess |
| white tails: carnivoresc | aposematism | likely |
| white tail tips: many species (e.g. elephant shrew) | luresf | possible |
| black tail tips: many species (e.g. springhare) | conspec signals | best guess |
| (j) all white | ||
| carnivoresc | background matching or | likelyg |
| thermoregulation | possible | |
| artiodactylsc | background matching or | likelyg |
| thermoregulation | possible | |
| marsupialsc, sifakasc | — | unknown |
| (k) sexual dichromatismh | ||
| pelage: lemursc, gibbonsc | intrasexual competition | possible |
| ornaments: various species (e.g. lion) | inter/intrasexual competition | possible |
| genitalia: baboonsc, managabeysc, macaquesc | intrasexual competition | possible |
Refers to function most likely to influence fitness but other functional consequences may apply.
Very likely: no alternative hypothesis can explain distribution of the coloration across species but still not tested systematically. Likely: best hypothesis but others cannot be dismissed. Possible: based on indirect supporting evidence only. Best guess: alternative hypotheses could apply and no systematic tests carried out. Unknown: no hypothesis stands up to scrutiny.
Only some species in the family exhibit the coloration.
Best guess for colobus, but gazelles: possible.
Signalling to predators or conspecifics.
Carnivores.
Particularly arctic species.
See electronic supplementary material.