Table 2.
categories | ||
---|---|---|
taxon | principal function of white and black pelagea | likelihoodb |
(a) black and white quills | ||
echidnas | aposematism | likely |
tenrecsc | aposematism | likely |
hedgehogs | aposematism | likely |
new world porcupines | aposematism | very likely |
old world porcupines | aposematism | very likely |
(b) horizontal white dorsal fur | ||
mephitids, mustelidsc, herpestidsc | aposematism | very likely |
striped possumsc | aposematism | likely |
anteatersc | aposematism | possible |
(c) black and white face masks | ||
canidsc, procyonidsc, mustelids, mephitids, viverridsc | aposematism | likely |
possumsc, dwarf lemursc and three-toed sloths | anti-glare | best guess |
lemursc | conspec signals | best guess |
callitrichidsc | sexual signals | best guess |
guenonsc | — | unknown |
old world monkeysc, gibbons | — | unknown |
artiodactylsc | conspec signals | possible |
or thermoregulation | best guess | |
(d) contrasting necks or chests | ||
gymnuresc, mustelidsc, viverridsc | aposematism | likely |
various species (e.g. Ryukyu flying fox) | — | unknown |
ursidsc | dominance badges | best guess |
(e) body with blocks of black and white fur | ||
various solitary species (e.g. Malayan tapir) | disruptive | best guess |
various social species (e.g. b&w colobus, gazelles) | conspec signals | best guessd |
various species with horizontal border (e.g. blackbuck) | — | unknown |
(f) black body and white spots or blotches | ||
various species (e.g. quolls) | pattern blending | likely |
(g) trunk with black transverse stripes | ||
marsupialsc, carnivoresc, duikersc | pattern blending | best guess |
zebras | — | unknown |
(h) contrasting feet, legs and rumps | ||
feet: kangaroosc, primatesc | non-functional | best guess |
legs: carnivoresc | aposematism | best guess |
legs: bovidsc | conspec signals | possible |
rumps: artiodactylsc | signalse or thermorgn | possible |
(i) black and white tails | ||
ringed tails: primatesc carnivoresc | conspec signals | likely |
ringed tails: carnivoresc | aposematism | best guess |
white tails: carnivoresc | aposematism | likely |
white tail tips: many species (e.g. elephant shrew) | luresf | possible |
black tail tips: many species (e.g. springhare) | conspec signals | best guess |
(j) all white | ||
carnivoresc | background matching or | likelyg |
thermoregulation | possible | |
artiodactylsc | background matching or | likelyg |
thermoregulation | possible | |
marsupialsc, sifakasc | — | unknown |
(k) sexual dichromatismh | ||
pelage: lemursc, gibbonsc | intrasexual competition | possible |
ornaments: various species (e.g. lion) | inter/intrasexual competition | possible |
genitalia: baboonsc, managabeysc, macaquesc | intrasexual competition | possible |
Refers to function most likely to influence fitness but other functional consequences may apply.
Very likely: no alternative hypothesis can explain distribution of the coloration across species but still not tested systematically. Likely: best hypothesis but others cannot be dismissed. Possible: based on indirect supporting evidence only. Best guess: alternative hypotheses could apply and no systematic tests carried out. Unknown: no hypothesis stands up to scrutiny.
Only some species in the family exhibit the coloration.
Best guess for colobus, but gazelles: possible.
Signalling to predators or conspecifics.
Carnivores.
Particularly arctic species.
See electronic supplementary material.