Table 2.
Substrate docking studies showing the effects of Na+ on binding affinity in the EAAT3 homology models and the GltPh X-ray crystal structures. (The HP2-loop occluded or open models were docked with l-glutamate and l-aspartate using the Gold software program and the structures were scored using ChemScore, where higher ChemScore values reflect better fitness for docked poses. All models contained either no Na+ ions or Na+ ions at site 1 (Na1), sites 1 and 2 (Na1+Na2), sites 1 and 3 (Na1+Na3) or sites 1, 2 and 3 (Na1+Na2+Na3).)
| ChemScore | ΔG (kJ mol−1) | |
|---|---|---|
| EAAT3|l-glu|no Na|occluded | 13.17 | −17.08 |
| EAAT3|l-glu|Na1|occluded | 14.36 | −18.01 |
| EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na2|occluded | 14.11 | −17.83 |
| EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na3|occluded | 17.61 | −26.20 |
| EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded | 18.45 | −27.00 |
| GltPh|l-glu|Na1+Na2|occluded | 14.74 | −23.54 |
| GltPh|l-glu|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded | 18.42 | −26.35 |
| GltPh|l-asp|Na1+Na2|occluded | 20.68 | −24.00 |
| GltPh|l-asp|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded | 23.71 | −28.00 |