Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 31;364(1514):155–161. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0246

Table 2.

Substrate docking studies showing the effects of Na+ on binding affinity in the EAAT3 homology models and the GltPh X-ray crystal structures. (The HP2-loop occluded or open models were docked with l-glutamate and l-aspartate using the Gold software program and the structures were scored using ChemScore, where higher ChemScore values reflect better fitness for docked poses. All models contained either no Na+ ions or Na+ ions at site 1 (Na1), sites 1 and 2 (Na1+Na2), sites 1 and 3 (Na1+Na3) or sites 1, 2 and 3 (Na1+Na2+Na3).)

ChemScore ΔG (kJ mol−1)
EAAT3|l-glu|no Na|occluded 13.17 −17.08
EAAT3|l-glu|Na1|occluded 14.36 −18.01
EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na2|occluded 14.11 −17.83
EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na3|occluded 17.61 −26.20
EAAT3|l-glu|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded 18.45 −27.00
GltPh|l-glu|Na1+Na2|occluded 14.74 −23.54
GltPh|l-glu|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded 18.42 −26.35
GltPh|l-asp|Na1+Na2|occluded 20.68 −24.00
GltPh|l-asp|Na1+Na2+Na3|occluded 23.71 −28.00