Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2008 Nov 3;16(3):241–259. doi: 10.1080/13825580802438868

Table 3.

Correlations between the Cognitive Measures and the Baseline Measures Language Sample Measures and Dual Task Costs to Fluency, Complexity, and Content.

Stroop
Interference
Digit Symbol
Speed
Working Memory
Composite

Young
Adults
Older
Adults
Young
Adults
Older
Adults
Young
Adults
Older
Adults
Baseline Language Sample
MLU −.02 −.09 +.40** +.39* +.31 +.31
% w/ fillers +.01 −.16 +.14 +.07 −.17 −.21
fillers/utterance +.15 −.14 +.12 +.04 −.15 −.12
WPM +.02 −.17 +.41** +.44** −.12 +.01
MCU −.11 −.19 +.14 +.19 +.54** +.37*
DLevel −.11 −.21 +.10 +.19 +.64** +.41*

Dual Task Costs to Language
MLU +.27 +.17 −.18 −.17 −.31 −.23
% w/ fillers +.48** +.23 +.11 +.04 −.05 +.01
fillers/utterance +.44** +.24 +.09 −.04 −.09 +.04
WPM −.12 +.24 +.47** +.54** +.09 −.04
MCU +.23 +.24 +.09 +.06 −.39* −.18
DLevel +.22 +.28 −.14 −.08 −.44** −.17

Note: MLU = mean length of utterance; fillers/utterance = number of fillers per utterance; % w/fillers = percentage of sentences with fillers; % Grammatical = percentage of grammatical sentences; WPM = words per minute; MCU = mean clauses per utterance; DLevel = developmental level; TTR = type-token ratio; PDensity = propositional density.

*

p < .05, prep ≥ .972

**

p < .01, prep ≥ .995