Table 1. Detransformed mean daily catches (transformed mean and standard error of the difference (SED) shown in brackets) of G. f. fuscipes caught over n days from odour-baited devices at various locations in western Kenya.
| Odour | Device | Location | Expt | Days | Males | Females | ||||
| Catch | (m±sed) | Index | Catch | (m±sed) | Index | |||||
| Cattle (×1) | E-net | Manga | 1 | 12 | 17.4 | (1.27±0.084) | 1.1 | 25.0 | (1.42±0.057) | 1.1 |
| E-net | Manga | 2 | 8 | 7.5 | (0.93±0.127) | 1.3 | 24.2 | (1.40±0.069) | 1.4 | |
| E-target | Rusinga | 3 | 8 | 8.3 | (0.97±0.068) | 0.9 | 21.5 | (1.35±0.065) | 0.9 | |
| Teso | 4 | 12 | 1.8 | (0.25±0.052) | 1.3 | 4.0 | (0.60±0.066) | 1.1 | ||
| E-target (S) | Chamaunga | 5 | 12 | 14.2 | (1.18±0.069) | 1.2 | 5.8 | (0.83±0.093) | 1.4 | |
| Trap | Chamaunga | 6 | 8 | 2.9 | (0.59±0.145) | 0.9 | 2.5 | (0.55±0.114) | 0.6 | |
| Trap+E-net | Chamaunga | 7 | 12 | 6.9 | (0.90±0.057) | 1.1 | 7.4 | (0.93±0.073) | 0.8 | |
| Cattle (×4) | E-target | Rusinga | 8 | 10 | 21.3 | (1.35±0.062) | 1.0 | 41.3 | (1.63±0.057) | 1.1 |
| Humans (×2) | E-Net | Manga | 1 | 12 | 14.5 | (1.19±0.084) | 0.9 | 20.1 | (1.32±0.057) | 0.9 |
| E-Net | Manga | 2 | 8 | 5.7 | (0.83±0.127) | 1.0 | 21.9 | (1.36±0.069) | 1.2 | |
| E-target | Rusinga | 3 | 8 | 10.1 | (1.05±0.068) | 1.0 | 26.9 | (1.45±0.065) | 1.1 | |
| Teso | 4 | 12 | 1.8 | (0.26±0.052) | 1.3 | 4.2 | (0.62±0.066) | 1.2 | ||
| E-target (S) | Chamaunga | 5 | 12 | 14.1 | (1.18±0.069) | 1.2 | 7.3 | (0.92±0.093) | 1.3 | |
| Trap | Chamaunga | 6 | 8 | 3.7 | (0.67±0.145) | 1.1 | 4.2 | (0.71±0.114) | 1.0 | |
| Trap+E-net | Chamaunga | 7 | 12 | 6.7 | (0.89±0.057) | 1.0 | 7.9 | (0.95±0.073) | 0.9 | |
| Pigs (×2–3) | E-Net | Manga | 1 | 12 | 14.1 | (1.18±0.084) | 0.9 | 18.6 | (1.29±0.057) | 0.8 |
| Manga | 2 | 8 | 8.8 | (0.99±0.127) | 1.5 | 28.0 | (1.46±0.069) | 1.6 | ||
| E-target | Rusinga | 3 | 8 | 11.3 | (1.09±0.068) | 1.2 | 25.2 | (1.42±0.065) | 1.1 | |
| Teso | 4 | 12 | 2.4 | (0.38±0.052) | 1.8* | 4.2 | (0.63±0.066) | 1.2 | ||
| Trap | Chamaunga | 6 | 8 | 5.1 | (0.79±0.145) | 1.6 | 5.6 | (0.82±0.114) | 1.3 | |
| Lizards (×6) | Trap | Teso | 9 | 12 | 3.0 | (0.60±0.097) | 2.6* | 9.9 | (1.04±0.040) | 3.0*** |
| E-target (S) | Rusinga | 10 | 12 | 28.2 | (1.47±0.051) | 1.2 | 61.2 | (1.79±0.040) | 1.2 | |
| Chamaunga | 5 | 12 | 18.3 | (1.29±0.069) | 1.5* | 12.3 | (1.12±0.093) | 2.1* | ||
| Trap+E-net | Rusinga | 11 | 12 | 41.1 | (1.62±0.048) | 1.4* | 66.6 | (1.83±0.034) | 1.5*** | |
| Chamaunga | 7 | 12 | 14.2 | (1.18±0.057) | 2.2*** | 14.2 | (1.18±0.073) | 1.5** | ||
| CO2 (2 L/min) – out | E-target | Rusinga | 12 | 6 | 26.0 | (1.43±0.028) | 1.2 | 53.6 | (1.74±0.024) | 1.6* |
| Kirindo | 13 | 9 | 10.6 | (1.06±0.103) | 2.9** | 20.6 | (1.33±0.081) | 2.1** | ||
| CO2 (2 L/min) – in | Kirindo | 13 | 9 | 6.3 | (0.87±0.103) | 1.8 | 14.8 | (1.2±0.081) | 1.5 | |
Carbon dioxide was dispensed within (‘in’) or outside (‘out’) the tent. The detransformed mean daily catch of each odour-baited devices is expressed as a proportion (Index) of that from an unbaited device; asterisks indicate that the index is significantly different from unity at the P<0.05 (*), P<0.01 (**) or P<0.001 (***) levels of probability. Treatments with the same experiment number (Expt.) were incorporated into the same Latin square.