Skip to main content
. 2009 May 8;5(5):e1000380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000380

Figure 5. The Inline graphic dependence of the KL divergences and the normalized distance measure, Inline graphic.

Figure 5

Data was generated from a third order model, as explained in the section “Generating synthetic data” (Methods), and fit to pairwise maximum entropy models and independent models. All data points correspond to averages over marginalizations of the true distribution (see text for details). The red points were computed directly using Eqs. (1), (3) and (4); the blue points are the zeroth order estimates, Inline graphic, Inline graphic, and Inline graphic, in rows 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The three columns correspond to Inline graphic, 0.029, and 0.037, from left to right. (A, B, C) (Inline graphic). Predictions from the perturbative expansion are in good agreement with the measurements up to Inline graphic, indicating that the data is in the perturbative regime. (D, E, F) (Inline graphic). Predictions from the perturbative expansion are in good agreement with the measurements up to Inline graphic, indicating that the data is only partially in the perturbative regime. (G, H, I) (Inline graphic). Predictions from the perturbative expansion are not in good agreement with the measurements, even for small Inline graphic, indicating that the data is outside the perturbative regime.