Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2008 Mar 17;179(5):1780–1784. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.032

TABLE 1. Clinicopathologic characteristics of prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Characteristic Biopsy Gleason Grouping p-value*

GS ≤ 6 GS 7 GS 8-10 Total
Patients (n) 10,326 2,650 458 13,434
Follow up (yr)
 Median (Range) 4.0 (0-22) 4.0 (0-20) 5.0 (0-19) 4.0 (0-22)
 Mean ± SD 5.4 ± 4.5 5.5 ± 4.5 6.4 ± 4.6 5.5 ± 4.5
Median year of surgery 2000 2000 1999 2000 <0.001
Age <0.001
 Median (Range) 58 (33-77) 59 (35-75) 60 (36-75) 58 (33-77)
 Mean ± SD 57.7 ± 6.5 59.0 ± 6.3 59.9 ± 6.6 58.1 ± 6.5
Race (%) < 0.001
 Caucasian 9,370 (91.0) 2,326 (88.3) 406 (89.2) 12,102 (90.1)
 African-American 592 (5.8) 204 (7.7) 36 (7.9) 832 (6.2)
 Other 332 (3.2) 103 (3.9) 13 (2.9) 448 (3.3)
PSA (ng/ml) <0.001
 Median 5.6 (0.2-151.0) 6.6 (0.3-129.0) 7.6 (0.2-68.1) 5.8 (0.2-151.0)
 Mean ± SD 6.7 ± 5.5 8.7 ± 8.2 10.1 ± 8.6 7.3 ± 6.3
PSA density
 Median (Range) 0.10 (0.01-2.30) 0.13 (0.01-7.28) 0.15 (0.01-1.14) 0.11 (0.01-7.28) <0.001
 Mean ± SD 0.13 ± 0.10 0.17 ± 0.20 0.19 ± 0.15 0.14 ± 0.13
Clinical Stage (%) < 0.001
 cT1 7,128 (69.2) 1,360 (51.6) 182 (40.0) 8,670 (64.8)
 cT2 3,113 (30.2) 1,238 (46.9) 255 (56.2) 4,606 (34.4)
 cT3 55 (0.5) 39 (1.5) 17 (3.7) 111 (0.8)
Prostate weight (g) <0.001
 Mean ± SD 56.4 ± 21.6 53.6 ± 18.3 56.6 ± 19.8 55.9 ± 20.9
Prostatectomy Gleason score (%) < 0.001
 ≤ 6 7,756 (75.3) 551 (20.8) 28 (6.1) 8,335 (62.1)
 7 2,358 (22.9) 1,783 (67.4) 143 (31.2) 4,284 (32.0)
 8-10 189 (1.8) 312 (11.8) 287 (62.7) 788 (5.9)
Extraprostatic extension 2,863 (27.7) 1,470 (55.5) 302 (65.9) 4,635 (34.5) < 0.001
Seminal vesicle invasion 74 (2.7) 325 (12.3) 93 (20.3) 692 (5.2) < 0.001
Lymph node invasion 126 (1.2) 155 (5.9) 57 (12.4) 338 (2.5) < 0.001
Positive surgical margin 1,306 (12.7) 494 (18.7) 116 (25.4) 1,916 (14.3) < 0.001
*

Indicates test for comparison among the three Biopsy Gleason sum cohorts. All tests for categorical data are chi-squared, ANOVA was used for continuous data