Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2009 Jan 16;33(1):117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.021

Figure 3.

Figure 3

a) sensitivity of ctp1∆ against various DNA damaging agents is identical to that of rad50∆ and the rad50∆ ctp1∆ double mutant. ctp1∆ is epistatic to rad32mre11-D65N. b) ctp1∆ is defective for the removal of Top2, but over-proficient for Top1 removal in mitotic cells. c) In line with results from the DLPD assay, deletion of pku80 rescues the CPT sensitivity of ctp1∆, but not that of rad50∆.