Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 12;67(3):316–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03358.x

Table 3.

Free propofol concentrations in the aqueous phase of lipid emulsion and microemulsion propofol and the effects of agents known to reduce propofol-induced pain on aqueous free propofol concentrations

Agents mixed with 5 ml of propofol formulations (concentration, volume) Lipid emulsion (µg ml−1) Microemulsion (µg ml−1)
Control* Test Control* Test
None 12.4 ± 0.7 83.9 ± 0.6
Lidocaine (20 mg ml−1, 0.5 ml) 12.3 ± 0.5 12.3 ± 0.6 84.2 ± 0.6 84.0 ± 0.7
Ketamine (50 mg ml−1, 0.2 ml) 12.4 (12.1, 12.5) 12.3 (11.6, 13.2) 83.9 ± 0.5 83.8 ± 0.7
Metoclopramide (5 mg ml−1, 1.0 ml) 12.2 ± 0.6 11.9 ± 0.6 84.0 ± 0.8 84.1 ± 0.8
Ondansetron (2 mg ml−1, 2.0 ml) 12.4 ± 0.7 12.5 ± 0.7 83.8 ± 0.9 83.9 ± 0.8
Thiopental (25 mg ml−1, 2.0 ml) 12.4 ± 0.7 12.2 ± 0.6 83.8 ± 0.9 83.8 ± 0.7
Ephedrine (5 mg ml−1, 0.4 ml) 12.3 ± 0.6 12.4 ± 0.7 83.9 ± 0.7 83.9 ± 0.8
*

Mixture of each propofol formulation (5 ml) and saline (0.2, 0.4, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 ml). For controls, pain-reducing agents were replaced with an equal volume of saline.

Control and test samples in each propofol formulation were compared to test the effects of agents known to reduce propofol-induced pain on the free propofol concentrations in the aqueous phase (P > 0.05 for all pairwise comparisons).

The free propofol concentrations in the aqueous phase of lipid emulsion and microemulsion propofol were compared (P < 0.001). n = 10 for all control and test samples. Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (25%, 75%).