Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;155(2):128–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03830.x

Table 1.

Studies examining concentrations of complement (C) components in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients compared with control subjects.

Reference C component measured Sample type Significant alteration in concentration compared with controls
Kuwert et al. 1965 [127] C3/C4 CSF Reduced
Link 1972 [128] C3/C4 CSF No difference
Dube et al. 1973 [129] C3/C4 CSF Increased
Yam et al. 1980 [130] C3/C4 CSF C3: increased
C4: no difference
Price et al. 1980 [131] C3/C4 CSF In relapse: no difference
In remission: decreased
Jans et al. 1984 [71] C3/C4 CSF/serum Serum and CSF C3: no difference
Serum C4: increased (P = 0·05)
CSF C4: reduced (P < 0·01)
Jongen et al. 2000 [72] C3/C4 CSF/serum Serum C3: reduced in RRMS and SPMS
CSF C3: reduced in RRMS
Serum and CSF C4: no difference
Sellebjerg et al. 1998 [76] C3 and TCC CSF/plasma C3: no difference
CSF TCC: increased and levels correlated with disability (P = 0·003)
Morgan et al. 1984 [73] C9 CSF/plasma Reduced in CSF
No difference in plasma
Compston et al. 1986 [132] C9 CSF/plasma Reduced in CSF
No difference in plasma
Sanders et al. 1986 [78] TCC CSF Increased
Mollnes et al. 1987 [77] TCC CSF/serum Increased in CSF
No difference in serum
Rodriguez et al. 1990 [74] C9 CSF No difference
Halawa et al. 1989 [75] C9 CSF No difference

CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; RRMS, relapsing–remitting multilpe sclerosis; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; TCC, terminal complement complex.