Table II.
VIGS analysis of candidate genes in resistant Motelle plants
| VIGS Construct | No. of Plants Challenged with V. dahliae | No. of Stunted Plants | Percentage of Stunted Plantsa |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRV:00 | 6 | 1 | 16 |
| TRV:Ve | 5 | 5 | 100 |
| TRV:Ve1 | 6 | 5 | 83 |
| TRV:Ve2 | 6 | 1 | 16 |
| TRV:Acif1 | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| TRV:Acik1 | 6 | 1 | 16 |
| TRV:Cmg1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| TRV:Eds1 | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| TRV:Fls2 | 6 | 1 | 16 |
| TRV:Mek2 | 5 | 4 | 80 |
| TRV:Mpk1 | 5 | 1 | 20 |
| TRV:Mpk2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| TRV:Mpk3 | 6 | 2 | 33 |
| TRV:Ndr1 | 6 | 4 | 66 |
| TRV:Npr1 | 6 | 2 | 33 |
| TRV:Nrc1 | 6 | 4 | 66 |
| TRV:Rar1 | 5 | 1 | 20 |
| TRV:Serk2 | 5 | 1 | 20 |
| TRV:Serk3-I | 6 | 5 | 83 |
| TRV:Serk3-II | 6 | 6 | 100 |
a
Data from one representative experiment out of three are shown.