. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Apr 30.

Published in final edited form as: Youth Soc. 2009;40(4):541–570. doi: 10.1177/0044118x08327506

Table 2.

Correlations among Study Constructs^a

Variable	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Family Functioning (A)	.18	.57^***	.35^***	-.16^*	.42^***	-.43^***	-.08	-.33^***	-.24^*	-.30^**	-.21
2. Family Functioning (P)	-------------	.06	.19^**	-.11	.13	-.16	-.44^***	-.02	-.05	-.18	-.21
3. School Functioning		-------------	.52^***	-.23^**	.45^***	-.70^***	-.01	-.52^***	-.29^**	-.27^*	-.35^**
4. Personal Identity Coherence			-------------	-.30^***	.47^***	-.30^***	-.16^*	-.24^**	.00	-.17	-.09
5. Personal Identity Confusion				-------------	-.03	.38^***	.13	-.05	-.01	.39^***	.13
6. Ethnic Identity					-------------	-.26^***	-.09	-.32^***	-.20^*	-.18	-.12
7. Conduct Problems (A)						-------------	.19^*	.53^***	.37^***	.56^***	.37^***
8. Conduct Problems (P)							-------------	.14	.01	.28^**	.30^**
9. Cigarette Use^b								-------------	.61^***	.68^***	.56^***
10. Alcohol Use^b									-------------	.35^**	.35^**
11. Illicit Drug Use^b										-------------	.43^***
12. Sexual Activity^b											-------------

Note: A = adolescent report; P = parent report.

Family functioning, school functioning, and conduct problems are represented here as latent variables.

These variables are on a dichotomous response scale.

p <.05

^**

p < .01

^***

p < .001