TABLE 1.
Selectivity ratios of D-sites for MAPKs
D-site peptide | Cognate MAPK | Cognate IC50 | Non-cognate MAPK | Non-cognate IC50 | Selectivity ratioa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEK1 | ERK2 | 32 | p38/MEF2Ab | >100 | >3 |
MEK1 | ERK2 | 32 | p38/ATF2 | 90 | 3 |
MEK1 | ERK2 | 32 | JNK1 | >100 | >3 |
MEK1 | ERK2 | 32 | JNK2 | >100 | >3 |
MEK1 mean | 3 | ||||
MEK1 median | 3 | ||||
MEK2 | ERK2 | 5 | p38/MEF2A | 40 | 8 |
MEK2 | ERK2 | 5 | p38/ATF2 | NDc | ND |
MEK2 | ERK2 | 5 | JNK1 | 60 | 12 |
MEK2 | ERK2 | 5 | JNK2 | >100 | >20 |
MEK2 mean | 13 | ||||
MEK2 median | 12 | ||||
MKK3 | p38b | <0.1 | JNK1 | 90 | >900 |
MKK3 | p38 | <0.1 | JNK2 | >100 | >1000 |
MKK3 | p38 | <0.1 | ERK2 | 5 | >50 |
MKK3 mean | 650 | ||||
MKK3 median | 900 | ||||
MKK4 | JNK1 | 2 | ERK2 | 26 | 13 |
MKK4 | JNK2 | 9 | ERK2 | 26 | 3 |
MKK4 | p38/MEF2A | 7 | ERK2 | 26 | 4 |
MKK4 | p38/ATF2 | 6 | ERK2 | 26 | 4 |
MKK4 mean | 6 | ||||
MKK4 median | 4 | ||||
MKK6 | p38/MEF2A | 20 | JNK1 | >100 | >5 |
MKK6 | p38/MEF2A | 20 | JNK2 | >100 | >5 |
MKK6 | p38/MEF2A | 20 | ERK2 | 17 | 1 |
MKK6 | p38/ATF2 | 10 | JNK1 | >100 | >10 |
MKK6 | p38/ATF2 | 10 | JNK2 | >100 | >10 |
MKK6 | p38/ATF2 | 10 | ERK2 | 17 | 2 |
MKK6 mean | 5 | ||||
MKK6 median | 5 | ||||
MKK7 | JNK1 | 8 | p38/MEF2A | >100 | >13 |
MKK7 | JNK1 | 8 | ERK2 | 85 | 11 |
MKK7 | JNK2 | 30 | p38/MEF2A | >100 | >3 |
MKK7 | JNK2 | 30 | ERK2 | 85 | 3 |
MKK7 mean | 7 | ||||
MKK7 median | 7 | ||||
All mean | 150 | ||||
All median | 8 |
Selectivity ratio = IC50 (D-site peptide with non-cognate MAPK)/IC50 (D-site peptide with cognate MAPK).
The p38 the substrate used is shown. For p38 inhibition by the MKK3 peptide, both substrates gave the same results.
ND, not determined.