Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2008 Sep;27(3):415–434. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9143-x

Table 4.

Summary of imaging reviewed

Modality Examples of specific methods described Advantages Disadvantages
MRI DCE-MRI, antibody contrast agents (αvβ3
 integrin, E-selectin)
Excellent anatomic information and spatial resolution; highly
 sensitive; multiple types of low-toxicity contrast; no radiation
 exposure
Expensive; motion effects; lack of targeted probes; longer
 procedure time
CT Functional CT Excellent anatomical information and spatial resolution; simple
 quantitation; direct proportion of contrast
Recurrent ionizing radiation exposure; contrast agent toxicity;
 lack of targeted probes
PET FDG, [18]F-FMISO, [15]O H2O, [15]O
 CO, radiolabeled peptides
Whole body imaging; direct proportion to contrast; high
 sensitivity; high throughput; ability to use multiple tracers
Expensive with limited availability; limited spatial resolution;
 lack of anatomical information; short radionuclide half-life
limited penetration; interoperator variability; lack of targeted
 probes
Ultrasound Color Doppler; power Doppler;
 microbubbles; antibody contrast agents
 (αvβ3 integrin)
Sensitive applications; anatomical imaging; inexpensive and
 widely available; portable;
Optical
 imaging
Near infra-red Highly sensitive; inexpensive; portable Poor tissue penetration allowing for superficial sites only; lack
 of anatomical information; technology still in early
 development