Table 1.
Polymeric and non-polymeric nanoparticulate vectors for gene delivery
Nanoparticles | Properties | References | |
---|---|---|---|
Poly lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) and Poly lactic acid (PLA) | Biocompatible and biodegradable, can provide sustained delivery of polynucleotides. | Kim et al 2005; Ribiero et al 2005 | |
Polyethyleneimine (PEI) | High transfection efficiency owing to faster endosomal escape. High toxicity reported in vitro and in vivo. | Moghimi et al 2005; Thomas et al 2005 | |
Polymeric | Polymethacrylate | Lower toxicity as compared to PEI. Endosomal buffering ability similar to PEI. | Dubruel et al 2003; Feng et al 2006 |
Poly-L-Lysine (PLL) | Biodegradable. Slow endosomal escape resulting in lower transfection efficiency | Merdan et al 2002; Zhang et al 2004 | |
Poly (β-amino ester) (PBAE) | High transfection efficiency comparable to PEI. Prolonged release of polynucleotide. | Lynn and Langer 2000; Little et al 2005 | |
Chitosan | Mucoadhesive property desired for oral and nasal delivery. Slow onset of expression. | Ferrari et al 1997; Koping-Hoggard et al 2001 | |
Cationic liposomes | Extensively used for in vitro transfections. High in vivo toxicity | Felgner et al 1987; Tousignant et al 2000 | |
Non-polymeric | Gold Nanoparticles | Highly inert and non-toxic. Surface functionalization can be easily performed. | Kawano et al al 2006; Sandhu et al 2002 |
Magnetic nanoparticles | High transfection efficiency in variety of cell lines. | Huth et al 2004; Scherer et al 2002 |