Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Oct 6;21(1):42–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01194.x

Table 1.

Comparison of Gastric Volumes Measured by Pulse Sequence

Measurements* HASTE LAVA CCC (95% CI) P value for Bland Altman Assessment #
Fasting 167 ± 10 156 ± 9 0.83 (0.70, 0.97) 0.28
Postprandial 5 525 ± 19 558 ± 19 0.82 (0.67, 0.97) 0.70
Postprandial 10 500 ± 16 538 ± 16 0.74 (0.56 – 0.93) 0.85
Postprandial 20 479 ± 13 507 ± 16 0.77 (0.61 – 0.94) 0.11
Postprandial 30 462 ± 11 481 ± 14 0.66 (0.41 – 0.90) 0.16
Postprandial change 5 352 ± 10 402 ± 12 0.45 (0.21, 0.69) 0.19
Postprandial change 10 327 ± 7 383 ± 10 0.32 (0.13, 0.51) 0.05
Postprandial change 20 307 ± 8 349 ± 12 0.53 (0.31, 0.74) 0.03
Postprandial change 30 290 ± 8 324 ± 11 0.36 (0.06, 0.66) 0.23
*

Numbers reflect imaging time, in minutes, relative to meal ingestion. Postprandial change is the difference between postprandial and fasting volume.

#

Test for (Pearson) correlation of differences versus overall mean