Table 5.
Number of Practices by Type of Grant | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
FY 2000–2001 | Challenge | Health IT | PIPS | |
Evidence report: impact and effectiveness | ||||
Greatest strength of evidence | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
High strength of evidence | 15 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Medium strength of evidence | 10 | 5 | 37 | 3 |
Lower impact or strength of evidence | 15 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
Lowest impact or strength of evidence | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 |
Evidence report: further research | ||||
Likely to be highly beneficial | 23 | 11 | 37 | 4 |
Likely to be beneficial | 15 | 6 | 16 | 8 |
Evidence report: not rated, but covered in projects | 104 | 5 | 53 | 5 |
Practice not addressed in evidence report | 6 | 3 | 2 |
Many projects are addressing health information technology that falls into more than one category.
AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; FY, fiscal year; IT, information technology; PIPS, Partnerships in Patient Safety projects.