Table 2.
Results of Linear Regression Analyses Assessing the Associations between Psychopathology Risk Groups and Functional Outcomes: Step 1 of the Mediation Model
| Unstandardized | Standardized | t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychopathology Risk Group | β (SE) | β (SE) | |
| 6th Grade Cumulative Grade Point Average (n= 521; df= 8, 512) | |||
| NEITHER (reference group) | -- | -- | NA |
| CONDUCT ONLY | -0.28 (.12) | -0.089 | -2.34* |
| DEPRESSED ONLY | -0.24 (.10) | -0.091 | -2.45* |
| COMORBID | -0.45 (.09) | -0.200 | -5.24*** |
| 7th Grade Global Functioning (n= 521; df= 9, 511) | |||
| NEITHER (reference group) | -- | -- | NA |
| CONDUCT ONLY | 2.18 (.84) | 0.104 | 2.58* |
| DEPRESSED ONLY | 0.56 (.71) | 0.031 | 0.78 |
| COMORBID | 2.20 (.63) | 0.143 | 3.48** |
Note. Covariates in the analyses were age, sex, family income, and race. For the regression model using 7th grade global functioning as the independent variable, a dichotomized version score indicating low 6th grade global functioning (CIS > 15) was also used as a covariate.
*
p <.05.
**
p <.01.
***
p <.001.