Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2008 Aug 10;32(3):535–553. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.011

Table 3.

Results of Linear Regression Analyses Assessing the Associations between Psychopathology Risk Groups and Potential Mediators: Step 2 of the Mediation Model

Potential Mediator Unstandardized β Standardized β t
 Psychopathology Risk Group
Social Competence

Teacher-Reported Social Competence
 NEITHER (reference group) -- -- NA
 CONDUCT ONLY 0.06 (.04) 0.07 1.50
 DEPRESSED ONLY 0.01 (.04) 0.02 0.36
 COMORBID 0.14 (.03) 0.20 4.47***
Parent-Reported Social Competence
 NEITHER (reference group) -- -- NA
 CONDUCT ONLY 0.06 (.05) 0.05 1.05
 DEPRESSED ONLY 0.13 (.05) 0.13 2.83**
 COMORBID 0.17 (.04) 0.20 4.35***

Social Support

Friend / Peer Support
 NEITHER (reference group) -- -- NA
 CONDUCT ONLY -0.13 (.12) -0.04 -1.05
 DEPRESSED ONLY -0.44 (.10) -0.17 -4.21***
 COMORBID -0.57 (.09) -0.27 -6.33***
Family / Teacher Support
 NEITHER (reference group) -- -- NA
 CONDUCT ONLY -0.24 (0.12) -0.09 -2.06*
 DEPRESSED ONLY -0.23 (0.10) -0.10 -2.29*
 COMORBID -0.57 (0.09) -0.29 -6.70***

Note. For each set of analyses n = 521; df= 8, 512. Covariates in the analyses were age, sex, family income, and race. For the regression model using 7th grade global functioning as the independent variable, dichotomized score indicating low 6th grade global functioning (CIS > 15) was also used as a covariate.

Lower scores indicate higher social competence.

*

p <.05.

**

p <.01.

***

p <.001.