. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 5.

Published in final edited form as: Ann Biomed Eng. 2008 Jul 29;36(10):1668–1680. doi: 10.1007/s10439-008-9541-9

Table 7.

Percent differences associated with Fig. 6.

Reconstructed biaxial data versus pipette-aspiration biaxial data (single-/bi-layer)
Axial % difference	λ_z = 1.1	λ_z = 1.2	λ_z = 1.3
Without constraint	−58.58 / −54.31	−74.91 / −72.90	−81.79 / −82.54
With constraint	−4.88 / 18.68	−37.84 / 10.13	−42.81 / 17.36
With constraint and fixed fiber angles	- / 13.96	- / 3.62	-/12.72
Circumferential % difference	λ_θ = 1.1	λ_θ = 1.2	λ_θ = 1.3
Without constraint	46.25 / 47.23	6.05/8.36	38.38 / 44.45
With constraint	23.58 / 45.40	−24.82/5.70	− 5.41 / 37.89
With constraint and fixed fiber angles	- / 47.45	- / 4.28	- / 30.00