Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2009 Mar 1;115(5):1100–1108. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24107

TABLE 5.

COMPARISON OF PROPORTION OF FATAL INFECTIONS AND INTENSITY AND TYPE OF TREATMENT

No. Patients No. Fatal Infections Proportion of Fatal Infections (95% CI) P Value
Phase 1 Standard 335 3 0.9% (0.3, 2.4%) 0.004
Intensive 343 19 5.5% (3.5, 8.3%)
Phase 2* Chemo Course 1 168 4 2.4% (0.8, 5.6%) 0.5361, 0.5052
Standard 65 1 1.5% (0.1, 7.4%) 0.5773
Intensive 103 3 2.9% (0.8, 7.6%)
Autologous SCT 137 5 3.6% (1.4, 7.8%) 0.2284
Standard 44 2 4.5% (0.8, 13.7%) 0.677
Intensive 93 3 3.2% (0.9, 8.4%)
Allogeneic SCT 147 2 1.4% (0.3, 4.4%)
Standard 52 1 1.9% (0.2, 9.0%) 0.655
Intensive 95 1 1.1% (0.1, 5.2%)
1

chemotherapy vs. autologous

2

chemotherapy vs. allogeneic

3

standard vs. intensive (Phase 2 fatal infections by induction)

4

autologous vs. allogeneic

*

Phase 2 therapy mortality also shown according to whether patient was randomized to standard versus intensive timing in induction

Abbreviations: CI - confidence interval; SCT - stem cell transplantation; No - number