Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Jan;14(1):73–87. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.10

Table 2.

Correlations between EMCL and IMCL stores measured by MRS and mean MA measured by CT of the soleus (n = 51) and TA muscles (n = 48)

Mean MA
Pearson
correlation
Spearman’s ρ
Soleus (relative to oil
  phantom)
 EMCL-CH2 −0.37 −0.20
 IMCL-CH2 −0.64 −0.64
 Total lipid (EMCL +
  IMCL-CH2)
−0.61 −0.60
 EMCL-CH3 −0.33* −0.20
 IMCL-CH3 −0.55 −0.61
 Total lipid (EMCL +
  IMCL-CH3)
−0.57 −0.57
TA (relative to oil
  phantom)
 EMCL-CH2 −0.41 −0.32*
 IMCL-CH2 −0.16 −0.29*
 Total lipid (EMCL +
  IMCL-CH2)
−0.40 −0.36*
 EMCL-CH3 −0.46 −0.35*
 IMCL-CH3 −0.27 −0.25
 Total lipid (EMCL +
  IMCL-CH3)
−0.38* −0.34*

EMCL, extramyocellular; IMCL, intramyocellular; MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy; MA, muscle attenuation; CT, computed tomography; TA, tibialis muscle; CH2, methylene; CH3, methyl.

*

Significant at 0.05 level.

Significant at 0.01 level.

0.05 < p < 0.10.