. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 6.

Published in final edited form as: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Jan;14(1):73–87. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.10

Table 5.

Pearson correlation matrix among EMCL and IMCL CH₂ and CH₃ peaks set relative to an external oil phantom

Variable	Soleus IMCL-CH₂	Soleus EMCL-CH₃	Soleus IMCL-CH₃	TA EMCL-CH₂	TA IMCL-CH₂	TA EMCL-CH₃	TA IMCL-CH₃
Soleus	0.57^†	0.40^†	0.61^†	0.34^*	0.03	0.34^*	0.17
EMCL-CH₂	(51)	(51)	(51)	(48)	(48)	(48)	(48)
Soleus		0.36^*	0.91^†	0.33	0.13	0.37	0.00
IMCL-CH₂		(51)	(51)	(48)	(48)	(48)	(48)
Soleus			0.30^*	−0.02	−0.05	−0.03	−0.14
EMCL-CH₃			(51)	(48)	(48)	(48)	(48)
Soleus				0.35^*	−0.09	0.39^†	0.06
IMCL-CH₃				(48)	(48)	(48)	(48)
TA					0.31^*	0.94^†	0.68^†
EMCL-CH₂					(48)	(48)	(48)
TA						0.13	0.79^†
IMCL-CH₂						(48)	(48)
TA							0.47^†
EMCL-CH₃							(48)

EMCL, extramyocellular; IMCL, intramyocellular; CH₂, methylene; CH₃, methyl; TA, tibialis muscle.nis shown in parentheses.

Significant at 0.05 level.

^†

Significant at 0.01 level.