Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 May 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Outcomes Manag. 2008 Dec 1;15(12):595–606.

Table 2.

Studies of Memory Aids and Cues to Optimize Medication Adherence

Study Design/Setting Sample* Intervention Definition of Adherence Results Effect Size (Cohen's d)
Friedman
et al
(1996) [60]
Friedman
(1998) [61]
RCT/US 267 men and women with hypertension,
mean age 76.0 yr (SD not reported)
Intervention: n = 133
Control: n = 134
Telephone-linked computer
system vs. Usual Care
≥ 80% of prescribed
doses taken measured
by pill count
At 6 mo, mean improvement in adherence was
Intervention: 17.7%
Control: 11.7%
P = 0.03
0.26
Fulmer et
al (1999)
[59]
RCT/US 50 men and women, mean age 74.2 (6.8) yr
Video telephone: n = 17
Telephone: n = 15
Control: n = 18
Daily video telephone call
reminder for 6 wk vs. daily
telephone call reminder for
6 wk vs. Usual Care
Percentage of prescribed
doses
taken measured by
EEM
At 2 mo, mean adherence was
Video telephone: 84%
Telephone: 74%
Control: 57%, F(2,34) = 4.08; P < 0.05
0.90
Jerant
et al
(2003)
[62]
RCT/US 37 men and women with heart failure
Telecare: n = 13, mean age 66.6 (10.9) yr
Telephone: n = 12, mean age 71.3 (14.1) yr
Control: n = 12, mean age 72.7 (11.4) yr
Interactive video-based home
telecare by nurse vs. telephone
calls by nurse vs.
Usual Care
> 75% of prescribed
doses taken measured
by self-report
At 2 mo, proportion adherent was
Telecare: 92% (12/13)
Telephone: 91% (10/11)
Control: 83% (10/12)
P = 0.75
Telecare vs. Control
0.46
Telephone vs. Control
0.37
Lee et al
(2006)
[63]
Multiphase, prospective
study with run-
in phase of 2 mo,
observational
phase of 6 mo, and
RCT of 6 mo/US
159 men and women with cardiovascular
risk factors
Intervention: n = 83, mean age 77 (10.5) yr
Control: n = 76, mean age 78 (6.2)yr
Time-specific blister packs,
medication education, and
pharmacist follow-up vs.
Usual Care
≥ 80% of prescribed
doses taken measured
by pill count
At 14 mo, proportion adherent was
Intervention: 97.4% (75/77)
Control: 21.7% (15/69)
P < 0.001
At 14 mo, mean adherence was
Intervention: 95.5 (SD = 7.7)
Control: 69.1 (SD = 16.4)
P < 0.001
2.72




2.10
Winland-
Brown and
Vallante
(2000)
[64]
RCT/US 61 men and women, mean age 87 yr
(SD not reported)
Voice-activated: n = 24
Medication box: n = 16
Control: n = 21
Voice-activated message and
automatic dispenser vs.
prefilled medication box vs.
Usual Care
Adherence measured
by pill count
After 6 mo, mean number of missed
doses was
Voice-activated: (1.7)
Medication box: (15.1)
Usual Care: (19.7)
F (2,59) = 20.28; P < 0.001
Voice activated was better than Medication
box (P < 0.01) and Usual Care
(P < 0.01)
−1.83

EEM = electronic event monitoring; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

*

Number in parentheses is standard deviation.