Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar 5;37(8):2483–2492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp073

Table 4.

Primers found for each subtype of avian influenza HA and comparison with number of probes generated by related tools

Subtype Number of targets Number of Nontargets Avg. percentage of diss. Number of FP Number of RP Number of PP Number of probes SlicSel Number of probes OligoSpawn
H1 48 526 8.4 51 52 70 20 2
H2 41 533 9.1 42 43 187 14 2
H3 72 502 11.1 41 61 135 7 1
H4 67 507 7.4 265 225 3724 18 2
H5 69 505 9.1 68 66 160 17 1
H6 100 474 15.4 36 27 3 4 3
H7 55 519 8.9 77 81 260 2 1
H8 9 565 6.3 489 482 14415 100 1
H9 23 551 8.7 140 152 1222 58 1
H10 16 558 6.8 243 302 3712 35 1
H11 45 529 5.9 267 262 4117 32 1
H12 15 559 7.1 472 494 12895 52 1
H13 10 564 14.4 41 33 98 1 2
H16 4 570 9.5 367 352 7629 68 1

The dissimilarity within a subtype is calculated as the average pairwise Hamming distance in the multiple sequence alignment expressed as percentage of the average sequence length. (FP: forward primers; RP: reverse primers; PP: primer pairs)