Skip to main content
. 2009 May;20(5):1078–1085. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008060624

Table 2.

Association between nephrology care of >6 mo and outcomes of predialysis treatmenta

Attribute n (%) Patients with Pre-ESRD Care (n [%]) Adjusted OR (95% CI)b
Survived
    yes 23,943 (82.5) 12,734 (53.2) 1.50 (1.40 to 1.62)
    no 5088 (17.5) 2159 (42.4)
AVF 3381 (11.7) 2781 (84.5) 4.00 (3.57 to 4.50)
AVG 1648 (5.7) 1181 (77.7) 2.23 (1.96 to 2.53)
Catheter 23,822 (82.6) 10,795 (45.3)
Hemoglobin >11 g/dl 7297 (25.1) 4350 (59.6 1.27 (1.20 to 1.35)
Predialysis ESA 8319 (28.7) 7014 (84.3) 5.98 (5.48 to 6.52)
BMI
    underweight 1421 (4.9) 603 (42.4) 0.97 (0.86 to 1.10)
    normal 9181 (31.6) 4372 (47.6)
    overweight 7899 (27.2) 4104 (52.0) 1.09 (1.02 to 1.16)
    obese 5093 (17.5) 2749 (54.0) 1.15 (1.06 to 1.24)
    clinically obese 2705 (9.3) 1525 (56.4) 1.27 (1.15 to 1.39)
    morbidly obese 2732 (9.4) 1540 (56.4) 1.32 (1.20 to 1.46)
Optimal albuminc 1618 (5.6) 1095 (67.7) 1.54 (1.35 to 1.74)
Dietary care 2420 (8.3) 2154 (89.0) 5.32 (4.30 to 6.59)
a

AVG, arteriovenous graft.

b

Adjusted for all factors in Tables 1 and 2.

c

≥4.0 g/dl by the bromcresol green method; 3.7 g/dl by the bromcresol purple method and ≥4.0 g/dl if analytic method missing. Analyses account for within-center clustering of patients.