Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 16;276(1659):1101–1107. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1554

Table 1.

Comparison of cranial and postcranial elements of selected dromaeosaurid taxa.

Austroraptor cabazai MML-195 Unenlagia comahuensis MCF PVPH 78 Buitreraptor gonzalezorum (Makovicky et al. 2005) Velociraptor mongoliensis (Barsbold & Osmólska 1999; Norell & Makovicky 1997, 1999) Deinonychus antirrhopus MCZ 4371 Achillobator giganticus (Perle et al. 1999) Utahraptor ostrommaysi (Kirkland et al. 1993)
maxilia
length (cm) 39a 10b 10.9c 39
heightd (cm) 8.5 1.8 3.5c 11.6
height/length ratio (%) 21% 18% 34%c 29%
tooth count 24 11c 11
humerus
length (cm) 26.2 26.5 b 13.5 25.4
least mid-shaft diameter (cm) 2.2 1.7 0.6
femur
length (cm) 56 36.8 14.5 23.8e 34.4 50.5
least mid-shaft diameter (cm) 7.1 2.2 0.7 1.67 e 6.7
tibia
length (cm) 56.5 41.8 a >14.9 25.5e,f 36 49 50.5
distal transverse width (cm) 14 6.3 a 3.8 e 11.3 14.5
pedal phalanx 2.II
length (cm) 5.7 1.8 2.4g 7.6
distal transverse width (cm) 1.7 0.6g
pedal phalanx 2.IV
length (cm) 4.8 2.1g
distal transverse width (cm) 4.7 0.8g
estimated body length (cm)h 494.3 323.6 135 208e 302 445
estimated body mass (kg)i 368 95 6 23.4e 77 264
a

Broken.

b

Estimated.

c

V. mongoliensis IGM 100/25.

d

Height at level of rostral margin of preorbital fenestra.

e

V. mongoliensis IGM 100/986.

f

Tibiotarsus.

g

V. mongoliensis IGM 100/985.

h

Calculated on the basis of body length regression for paravians by Turner et al. (2007).

i

Calculated with the equation of Christiansen & Fariña (2004) in Turner et al. (2007).