Table 2.
Δcomba S1–S2 | Δcomba S2–S3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
dependent variable: | d.f. | F | p-value | F | p-value |
TTreatb | 1,19 | 84.12 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.96 |
PTreatc | 1,19 | 1.09 | 0.31 | 4.98 | <0.05 |
TTreat×PTreat | 1,19 | 0.06 | 0.8 | 3.19 | 0.09 |
ΔMDAd | 1,19 | 13.07 | <0.01 | 1.29 | 0.27 |
ΔTASe | 1,19 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 8.54 | <0.01 |
ΔMDA×TTreat | 1,19 | 4.09 | <0.05 | 0.82 | 0.37 |
ΔTAS×TTreat | 1,19 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 1.12 | 0.29 |
ΔMDA×PTreat | 1,19 | 2.62 | 0.12 | 3.16 | 0.09 |
ΔTAS×PTreat | 1,19 | 0.02 | 0.88 | 0.3 | 0.59 |
Δcomb was calculated as the difference between the final and initial comb area, corrected for the initial comb area.
TTreat=males, sham implanted (T−) versus testosterone implanted (T+) males.
PTreat=parasite treatment, categorical: P− males: not challenged; P+ males: challenged with infective T. tenuis larvae.
ΔMDA was calculated as the difference in MDA concentration between S2 and S1 corrected for MDA concentration at S1.
ΔTAS was calculated as the difference in TAS concentration between S2 and S1 corrected for TAS concentration at S1.