Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 2;276(1659):1093–1100. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1570

Table 2.

Effect of treatments, changes in plasma concentration of malondialdehyde (ΔMDA) and antioxidant activity (ΔTAS) on changes in ornamentation (Δcomb) at different sampling times (S1–S2; S2–S3).

Δcomba S1–S2 Δcomba S2–S3


dependent variable: d.f. F p-value F p-value
TTreatb 1,19 84.12 <0.001 0 0.96
PTreatc 1,19 1.09 0.31 4.98 <0.05
TTreat×PTreat 1,19 0.06 0.8 3.19 0.09
ΔMDAd 1,19 13.07 <0.01 1.29 0.27
ΔTASe 1,19 0.46 0.51 8.54 <0.01
ΔMDA×TTreat 1,19 4.09 <0.05 0.82 0.37
ΔTAS×TTreat 1,19 0.39 0.54 1.12 0.29
ΔMDA×PTreat 1,19 2.62 0.12 3.16 0.09
ΔTAS×PTreat 1,19 0.02 0.88 0.3 0.59
a

Δcomb was calculated as the difference between the final and initial comb area, corrected for the initial comb area.

b

TTreat=males, sham implanted (T−) versus testosterone implanted (T+) males.

c

PTreat=parasite treatment, categorical: P− males: not challenged; P+ males: challenged with infective T. tenuis larvae.

d

ΔMDA was calculated as the difference in MDA concentration between S2 and S1 corrected for MDA concentration at S1.

e

ΔTAS was calculated as the difference in TAS concentration between S2 and S1 corrected for TAS concentration at S1.