Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 17;64A(6):682–687. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp013

Table 2.

Pearson Correlations Among the Traditional HRV Indices in the WHAS-I and Framingham

VLF LF HF SDNN pNN50 RMSSD
VLF
LF .69 (.85)
HF .48 (.61) .84 (.77)
SDNN .78 (.86) .80 (.75) .75 (.63)
pNN50 .49 (.47) .64 (.57) .77 (.87) .78 (.53)
RMSSD .39 (.48) .72 (.60) .91 (.93) .79 (.54) .84 (.94)

Note: Correlations for Framingham [reported in Tsuji (19)] are given in parentheses. HRV = heart rate variability; WHAS-I = Women's Health and Aging Study-I; VLF = very low frequency; LF = low frequency; HF = high frequency; SDNN = standard deviation of N-N intervals; pNN50 = proportion of all N-N intervals that are larger than 50 ms; RMSSD = root-mean-squared differences of successive N-N intervals.