Skip to main content
. 2009 May 15;284(20):13602–13609. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M900894200

TABLE 1.

Cdc42 FRET analysis The table shows FRET efficiency obtained for Cdc42V12/N17-effector interactions by AP-FRET (first column) and changes in lifetime obtained with FLIM (third column). Data in the second column represent cross-correlation values for changes in mRFP/GFP intensity monitored during bleaching in AP-FRET. Data are expressed as averages ± S.D. (n = 7–12).

Construct AP-FRET efficiency ± S.D. Cross-correlation value ± S.D.a FLIM-FRET efficiency ± S.D.
% %
Positive control
   mRFP-GFP (tandem fusion) 28.6 ± 3.7 –0.99 ± 0.01 25.4 ± 7.4
Negative controls
   Cyto-mRFP/GFP 1.9 ± 1.5 0.17 ± 0.63 1.1 ± 1.2
   mRFP-IRSp53 + cyto-GFP 2.1 ± 1.5 –0.16 ± 0.55
   GFP-N-WASP + cyto-mRFP 2.7 ± 1.9 –0.63 ± 0.42
Experimental
   mRFP-Cdc42V12 + GFP-CRIB (domain) 18.4 ± 3.6 –0.99 ± 0.01 22.7 ± 5.5
   mRFP-Cdc42N17 + GFP-CRIB (domain) 2.3 ± 2.3 –0.09 ± 0.75 4.1 ± 1.8
   mRFP-N-WASP + GFP-Cdc42V12 10.2 ± 2.4 –0.97 ± 0.02 11.7 ± 2.4
   mRFP-N-WASP + GFP-Cdc42N17 2.4 ± 1.7 –0.47 ± 0.49 6.0 ± 2.2
   mRFP-IRSp53 + GFP-Cdc42V12 9.8 ± 3.5 –0.94 ± 0.06 13.8 ± 4.2
   mRFP-IRSp53 + GFP-Cdc42N17 2.7 ± 2.7 –0.10 ± 0.69 3.5 ± 2.6
a

n = 7–12 cells for each pair. Cross-correlation values between –0.7 and –1.0 are considered as positive FRET (12)