Table 2.
M form | S form | ||||||||||
# | Locality | N | R | S | D | P-value | N | R | S | D | P-value |
1 | Abomey | 3 | - | 1 | - | - | 68 | 0 | 0.87 | 0.13 | 0.144 NS |
2 | Bohicon | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | 3 | 0 | 0.82 | 0.18 | 0.654 NS |
3 | Houegbo | 9 | - | 1 | - | - | 62 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.715 NS |
4 | Niaouli | 50 | - | 1 | - | - | 12 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.835 NS |
5 | Paouignan | 0 | - | - | - | - | 41 | 0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.352 NS |
6 | Zogbodomey | 13 | - | 1 | - | - | 9 | 0 | 0.94 | 0.06 | 0.808 NS |
7 | Cana | 38 | - | 1 | - | - | 26 | 0 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.227 NS |
8 | Bembereke | 0 | - | - | - | - | 62 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.647 NS |
9 | Parakou | 0 | - | - | - | - | 20 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.873 NS |
10 | Bassila | 0 | - | - | - | - | 76 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.68 NS |
11 | Tanguieta | 0 | - | - | - | - | 47 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.673 NS |
12 | Natitingou | 0 | - | - | - | - | 48 | 0 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.918 NS |
13 | Djougou | 0 | - | - | - | - | 46 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.03 | 0.750 NS |
14 | Dassa | 0 | - | - | - | - | 64 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.652 NS |
15 | Savalou | 0 | - | - | - | - | 29 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.789 NS |
Total Bénin | 115 | - | 1 | - | - | 221 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.052 NS | |
16 | Darsalamy | 7 | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.096 NS |
17 | Dioulassoba | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | 23 | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 0.044 * |
18 | Kuinima | 0 | - | - | - | - | 27 | 0 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.002 ** |
19 | Mombamba | 8 | - | 1 | - | - | 7 | 0 | 0.85 | 0.15 | 0.563 NS |
20 | Sabou | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | 14 | 0 | 0.76 | 0.24 | 0.198 NS |
21 | Samandeni | 20 | - | 1 | - | - | 25 | 0 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.002 ** |
22 | Séguéré | 10 | - | 1 | - | - | 8 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.049 * |
23 | Soumousso | 32 | - | 1 | - | - | 12 | 0 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 0.153 NS |
24 | Vallée du Kou | 86 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.641 NS | 80 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.51 | 0.000 *** |
25 | Yegueresso | 8 | 0 | 0.87 | 0.13 | 0.592 NS | 2 | 0 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 0.560 NS |
26 | Boromo | 38 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0 | 1.000 NS | 2 | 0 | 0.71 | 0.29 | 0.560 NS |
Total Burkina Faso | 212 | 0.03 | 0.97 | 0 | 1.000 NS | 202 | 0.12 | 0.53 | 0.35 | 0.000 *** | |
27 | Toumodi | 18 | 0 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.001 *** | 0 | - | - | - | - |
28 | Niamoue | 24 | 0.35 | 0 | 0.65 | 0.000 *** | 0 | - | - | - | - |
29 | Toumbokro | 19 | 0.23 | 0.61 | 0.16 | 0.195 NS | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.008 ** |
30 | Yaokoffikro | 0 | - | - | - | - | 19 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.009 ** |
Total Ivory Coast | 61 | 0.26 | 0.4 | 0.34 | 0.000 *** | 24 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.42 | 0.001 *** | |
31 | Lomé (Togo) | 73 | 0 | 0.93 | 0.07 | 0.391 NS | 13 | 0 | 0.88 | 0.12 | 0.531 NS |
For each population sampled, the number of mosquitoes of each of the S and M molecular forms of An. gambiae is given, together with the estimated frequency of the various alleles: R, S and D for ace-1R, ace-1S and ace-1D, respectively. A global estimation is also presented for each country sampled. The populations in italics are those in which Ag-ace-1D has been identified by molecular analysis [5]. Finally, the p-value for the test for the presence of ace-1D is also given for each population (see Methods), with NS for P ≥ 0.05, * for P < 0.05, ** for P < 0.01 and *** for P < 0.001 (except when no estimate was possible, i.e. when all the mosquitoes of a sample were susceptible). The P-values that remained significant after Bonferroni correction (see methods) are presented in bold; P-values no longer significant after Bonferroni correction are shown in italics.