Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;99(6):1013–1022. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.140681

TABLE 1.

Participants, by State, and Relevant State Characteristics: 2006

State No. Participants and Role Proportion of Population That Is Blacka Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Among Blacksb Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Among MSMb Total Federal HIV/AIDS Fundingb Health Department Contracts Directed Toward Black MSM,cPrimarily (Partially)
California 7 health department staff 6 CBO staff/community leaders 6% 18% 67% $365 549 096 11 (167)
District of Columbia 5 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders 55% 78% 44% $85 883 916 1 (18)
Florida 5 health department staff 2 CBO staff/community leaders 15% 49% 40% $281 846 999 2 (30)
Illinois 2 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders 15% 49% 49% $102 599 329 6 (59)
Maryland 2 health department staff 1 CBO staff/community leader 29% 79% 26% $95 191 488 5 (135)
Massachusetts 2 health department staff 2 CBO staff/community leaders 6% 26% 36% $75 159 325 0 (20)
Michigan 3 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders 14% 57% 49% $46 110 971 3 (15)
New York 3 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders 16% 44% 28% $497 522 989 5 (100)
North Carolina 3 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders 21% 67% 32% $44 649 272 5 (48)
Texas 5 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders 12% 31% 55% $190 350 576 9 (19)

Note. MSM = men who have sex with men; CBO = community-based organization.

a

Data from the US Census Bureau.13

b

Data from the Kaiser Family Foundation.14

c

Data from Randall et al.15