TABLE 1.
Participants, by State, and Relevant State Characteristics: 2006
State | No. Participants and Role | Proportion of Population That Is Blacka | Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Among Blacksb | Proportion of HIV/AIDS Cases Among MSMb | Total Federal HIV/AIDS Fundingb | Health Department Contracts Directed Toward Black MSM,cPrimarily (Partially) |
California | 7 health department staff 6 CBO staff/community leaders | 6% | 18% | 67% | $365 549 096 | 11 (167) |
District of Columbia | 5 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders | 55% | 78% | 44% | $85 883 916 | 1 (18) |
Florida | 5 health department staff 2 CBO staff/community leaders | 15% | 49% | 40% | $281 846 999 | 2 (30) |
Illinois | 2 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders | 15% | 49% | 49% | $102 599 329 | 6 (59) |
Maryland | 2 health department staff 1 CBO staff/community leader | 29% | 79% | 26% | $95 191 488 | 5 (135) |
Massachusetts | 2 health department staff 2 CBO staff/community leaders | 6% | 26% | 36% | $75 159 325 | 0 (20) |
Michigan | 3 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders | 14% | 57% | 49% | $46 110 971 | 3 (15) |
New York | 3 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders | 16% | 44% | 28% | $497 522 989 | 5 (100) |
North Carolina | 3 health department staff 3 CBO staff/community leaders | 21% | 67% | 32% | $44 649 272 | 5 (48) |
Texas | 5 health department staff 4 CBO staff/community leaders | 12% | 31% | 55% | $190 350 576 | 9 (19) |