Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 22;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-10

Table 2.

Subject Characteristics Prior to Treatment

Demographics McGill
All Subjects Age % male I-a I-b I-a+b II III

Celliant™ 57.7 ± 11.8 70% 1.2 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 1.5 4.7 ± 2.4 2.6 ± 1.0

Control 61.6 ± 11.8 68% 1.3 ± 0.7 1.1 ± 1.0 2.4 ± 1.6 5.4 ± 2.8 3.1 ± 1.1

DPN group

Celliant™ 63.0 ± 7.7 85% 1.2 ± 0.9 0.6 ± 0.7 1.9 ± 1.5 5.1 ± 2.6 2.7 ± 1.1

Control 63.9 ± 11.0 77% 1.4 ± 0.7 1.2 ± 1.1 2.5 ± 1.7 5.2 ± 2.9 2.9 ± 0.9

Non-DPN group

Celliant™ 52.7 ± 13.1 57% 1.2 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.8 1.9 ± 1.5 4.4 ± 2.3 2.4 ± 0.9

Control 59.5 ± 12.3 60% 1.3 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 1.0 2.3 ± 1.6 5.6 ± 2.8 3.3 ± 1.2

Brief Pain Inventory

All Subjects Pain Severity Pain Interference VAS SF-36: Bodily Pain

Celliant™ 4.2 ± 2.4 5.8 ± 2.4 37.8 ± 8.1 4.2 ± 2.4

Control 5.5 ± 2.6 6.4 ± 1.8 34.6 ± 7.8 5.5 ± 2.6

DPN group

Celliant™ 4.9 ± 2.0 4.7 ± 2.5 5.9 ± 2.4 34.2 ± 7.4

Control 5.1 ± 2.3 5.5 ± 2.9 6.1 ± 1.9 36.1 ± 7.5

Non-DPN group

Celliant™ 3.9 ± 1.9* 3.8 ± 2.3* 5.8 ± 2.5 40.8 ± 7.7

Control 5.3 ± 1.6* 5.6 ± 2.3* 6.6 ± 1.8 33.3 ± 8.1

*denotes significant (p < 0.05) differences between Celliant™ and Control subjects.