Table 3.
ARI values for each subject during the Sit-to-stand and the Thigh-cuff trials.
| Sit-to-stand (STS) | Thigh-cuff (TC) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1 | 2 | 3 | ARI, mean(SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | ARI, mean(SD) |
| 104 | 6 | 7 | TL | 6.5(0.7) | 6 | 9 | Refused | 7.5(2.1) |
| 105 | 8 | 6 | TL | 7.0(1.4) | 6 | 7 | Refused | 6.5(0.7) |
| 106 | 6 | TI | 5 | 5.5(0.7) | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5.3(0.6) |
| 107 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7.3(0.6) | 7 | 9 | 7 | 7.7(1.2) |
| 108 | 3 | 3 | TI | 3.0(0.0) | 7 | 2 | Refused | 4.5(3.5) |
| 109 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6.7(0.6) | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8.3(0.6) |
| 110 | TI | 6 | 4 | 5.0(1.4) | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6.7(0.6) |
| 111 | 9 | 9 | TI | 9.0(0.0) | 5 | 9 | 5 | 6.3(2.3) |
| 112 | 6 | TI | 7 | 6.5(0.7) | 6 | TI | 7 | 6.5(0.7) |
| 202 | 9 | 8 | TI | 8.5(0.7) | TI | 9 | 9 | 9.0(0.0) |
| 210 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6.3(1.5) | 9 | 6 | Refused | 7.5(2.1) |
| 214 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4.3(1.2) | 8 | 6 | TI | 7.0(1.4) |
| 216 | 9 | 9 | TI | 9.0(0.0) | TI | 8 | 7 | 7.5(0.7) |
| 218 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9.0(0.0) | 6 | 6 | Refused | 6.0(0.0) |
| 219 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.0(0.0) | 6 | 9 | Refused | 7.5(2.1) |
| 224 | 7 | 6 | TL | 6.5(0.7) | 9 | 6 | Refused | 7.5(2.1) |
| 233 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4.0(2.0) | 9 | 6 | 7 | 7.3(1.5) |
|
| ||||||||
| Group Mean | 6.4(1.9) | 7.0(1.1) | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| One-Way Analysis of Variance | ||||||||
| STS | TC | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Mean Squared (MS) Deviations (df) | 3.96 (40) | 2.49 (39) | ||||||
| Between Subject MS Deviations (df) | 8.46 (16) | 2.69 (16) | ||||||
| Within Subject MS Deviations (df) | 0.97 (24) | 2.35 (23) | ||||||
TI= technically inadequate, TL= time limited and study had to be cut short after two trials, Refused= Subject refused because the thigh-cuff were too painful. MS= Mean Squared Deviations, BMS= Between Subject MS Deviations, WMS= Within Subject MS Deviations.