Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Processes. 2009 Feb 13;81(2):322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.01.010

Table 2.

Design Summary of Experiment 2

Group Phase 1 Phase2 Phase 3 Test X
AX+20 6 A+/6 X+ 8 AX+ 20 min Cr
AX+80 6 A+/6 X+ 8 AX+ 480 min Cr
X-20 6 A+/6 X+ 8 X− 20 min Cr
X-480 6 A+/6 X+ 8 X− 480 min CR

Note: CS A was a high frequency complex tone and CS X was a click train. All CSs were 10 s during training and 30 s during testing. The US (+) was a brief footshock. Slashes denote interspersed trials within sessions. CR (Cr) denotes a strong (intermediate) expected conditioned response based upon prior research. Training (Phases 1 and 2) was conducted in one context and testing was conducted in a physically distinct context.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure