Table 2.
Dam-based QTL modelling of lice abundance in family 3
| df | SS | LOD | effects (sd) | % var | p-value | |
| Full model | ||||||
| Model | 3 | 817.8 | 7.8 | 38.4 | 1.9 e-07 | |
| Error | 70 | 1312.5 | ||||
| Drop-one-term analysis | ||||||
| c6loc3d | 1 | 275.9 | 3.1 | 4.07 (1.06) | 12.9 | 2.7 e-04 |
| Sex | 1 | 225.5 | 2.5 | 3.61 (1.04) | 10.6 | 9.0 e-04 |
| Body weight | 1 | 205.1 | 2.3 | 0.01 (0.03) | 9.6 | 1.5 e-03 |
Notes. Degrees of freedom (df), sum of squares (SS), LOD scores (LOD), estimated effects (sd: standard deviation), percent of variance explained (% var), and p-values in drop-one-term analysis were obtained by comparing the full model to the reduced model with the term in the first column dropped; c6loc3d denotes predicted QTL genotypes at position 3.0 cM of LG 6 in dam-based analysis.