Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 17;28(51):13876–13888. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2823-08.2008

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

C1q KO mice show improved recovery in the fine details of gait as assessed by CatWalk. A–C, No significant differences were noted on CatWalk between naive C1q KO and WT mice (Student's t test, p > 0.05). D–F, However, C1q KO mice showed improved behavioral recovery compared with WT at the end of the study, 28 d post-injury. D, C1q KO mice exhibited an increase in %RI compared with WT mice (90.3 ± 1.9% vs 84.5 ± 2.4%, respectively, Student's t test, *p < 0.05). E, In addition, C1q KO mice showed a significant increase in the average swing duration of the hindlimbs compared with WT mice (58 ± 3 ms vs 52 ± 2 ms, respectively, Student's t test, *p < 0.05). F, Furthermore, C1q KO mice showed a significant reduction in the average swing speed of the hindlimbs compared with WT mice (0.85 m/s ± 0.02 vs 0.93 m/s ± 0.03, respectively, Student's t test, *p < 0.05). Error bars represent group means ± SEM.