Table 3.
Distribution of paired bases in RNA helical structures.
| Helical location† | Base-pair‡ |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | G·C_WC | A·U_WC | G·U_w | G·A_s | A·U_H | U·U_w | G·A_WC | |
| Interior | ||||||||
| intact | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.74 | 0.25 |
| ‘nick’ | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.66 |
| ‘insert’ | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| Terminus | ||||||||
| intact | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
| ‘insert’ | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.19 | 0 | 0.02 |
Fraction of the specified nucleotide association in different structural contexts within the arrays of stacked base pairs in high-resolution RNA structures: intact – sequential bases laterally attached to D-ribose sugars that are linked, in turn, via a normal 3′-5′ covalent phosphodiester linkage; ‘nick’ – bases or base pairs attached to sequentially distant sugars and thereby ‘broken’ by the folding of the nucleotide backbone; insert – single bases or base pairs that resemble intercalating ligands by stacking against or between chemically intact base-paired steps