Table 2.
December 2005
|
January 2006a |
October 2006
|
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOC
|
SDA
|
TOC
|
SDA
|
TOC
|
SDA
|
||||||
BD | MD | BD | MD | BD | BD | MD | BD | MD | BD | MD | |
N1 | − | nd | +++ | +++ | − | − | nd | − | nd | +++ | +++ |
N2
|
−
|
nd
|
+++
|
+++
|
−
|
−
|
nd
|
−
|
nd
|
+++
|
+++
|
S1 | − | nd | +++ | nd | − | +++ | −(42) | ++(33) | ++(36) | +++ | ++ |
S2 | +++ | − | +++ | nd | − | +++ | +++ | − | nd | +++ | ++ |
Results for a 30 days period and day of degradation, if occurred within 60 days after sampling, as numbers in brackets.
complete degradation (> 90%)
degradation (50 to 90%)
little degradation (10 to 50%)
no degradation (< 10%)
not detected
North port samples 1, 2
South port samples 1, 2
No metabolites detected in TOC method